tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-91476722322855314292024-02-20T23:16:31.043-08:00Hands on AndroidUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-37021873286019436972020-03-26T11:22:00.001-07:002020-03-26T11:22:26.509-07:00best versions of 2048 for android phones 2048 was a super popular puzzle game in 2014. There are about a billion clones making it hard to fine a solid, ad free implementation. Here are a few that I like.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ekstar.game2048&hl=en_US">Ekstar 2048 </a> - Simple implementation of the basic game with no ads and a refreshing color scheme. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ClassicStudio.game2048&hl=en_US">2048 classic</a> - traditional in all ways, game play and color scheme, no ads.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.alan.better2048&hl=en">2048/3: improved hybrid</a> - A bit of a blend of 2048 and 3s. I like it better than 2048, but I suppose that comes down to taste. no ads.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=vo.threes.free&hl=en">Threes!</a> - this is what inspired 2048. But frankly I think the original isn't as good as what came later. But if you've never played 3s it's worth seeing how this all evolved. It does have ads, or you can pay the astronomical price of $6 for the ad-free version. Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-75144405416945914642020-01-28T13:00:00.001-08:002020-02-15T22:48:08.801-08:00Fixing gboard (google keyboard) voice input problem on android 9/10Here's the problem: tap the microphone icon in gboard (aka google keyboard) and it responds like it can hear you, including the "VU" moving back and forth like the microphone is picking up the volume change between talking and silence. BUT: the expected text never shows up. It never transcribes your voice to text, or it only works 1 time out of 10. It took me a long while to fix this problem, but I finally did, though it requires ADB and a trusted source of an old keyboard APK.<br />
<br />
I thought this was a Samsung problem since it showed up on my Note 10 first. Maybe something to do with Bixby, "the worst voice assistant for your phone, ever(TM)". I was hopeful that upgrading from android 9 to 10 would fix it, but no dice there either. I tried all the suggestions online but those were all pretty obviously irrelevant since the microphone was picking up sounds, just not transcribing.<br />
<br />
Then the breakthru: my LG Stylo 5 started to have the problem too. For once I couldn't blame Bixby. So there must be a bug in the gboard app itself. Of course I had already tried reinstalling it, clearing cache, and even factory resetting my Note 10 (spoiler: no help).<br />
<br />
So how about "downgrading" to an older version of the google keyboard? I'd never had a problem with my other phones. Indeed this is the solution, but not an easy one.<br />
<br />
Getting an old version of the keyboard can be done one of two ways. For phone hoarders like myself you can extract the APK from your old phone and then copy it to your new phone. This only gives only a few versions to choose (at most, as many as the phones you own) . I went a different route: apkmirrror which I consider to be trustworthy enough (run by the same folks who do android police). Your keyboard touches lots of sensitive things (passwords!) so you'll have to convince yourself.<br />
<br />
The version of the gboard app that I found to work properly was <a href="https://www.apkmirror.com/apk/google-inc/gboard/gboard-7-9-7-230658658-release/gboard-the-google-keyboard-7-9-7-230658658-lite_release-arm64-v8a-android-apk-download/download/"> Google Keyboard 7.9.7.230658658. </a>Versions
as new as 8.3.6 still had intermittent problems, so I guess this is a
long standing bug but for some reason it doesn't get triggered until
android 9/10. I didn't search exhaustively, but frankly, has gboard
really gotten any better in the last 2 years? Just grab the version I
did and get on with it! <br />
<br />
Next: downgrading a currently installed app is not trivial. In fact it cannot be done from your phone directly, which is a big issue if your phone came with gboard already installed (like my stylo 5 does). If you can uninstall gboard then it's easy to install the old version: copy the apk to your phone, and open it with a file browser. Tell android to allow the app to install unsigned APKs, and continue. I won't go into details since sideloading is pretty well known.<br />
<br />
So what if you can't get rid of the newer copy of gboard? It's not that hard but you'll have to install adb on your PC <b>and </b>put your phone in developer mode. If you don't know how, it's too many steps to include here, but google "install ADB", "android developer mode", and finally "usb debugging". Now plug your phone, and two start cmd.exe in the same folder as teh adb.exe. <br />
<br />
First, place the proper apk (I renamed it gboard.apk) on your phone in an accessible folder (not downloads).<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>adb push t:\gboard.apk /data/local/tmp</b><br />
<br />
Then tell your phone to install the apk, allowing for downgrades:<br />
<br />
<b> adb shell pm install -r -d /data/local/tmp/gboard.apk</b><br />
<br />
At the command line you should see "Success".<br />
<br />
if you see something like this: "avc: denied { read } for scontext=u:r:system_server:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:sdcardfs:s0 tclass=file permissive=0<br />
System server has no access to read file context u:object_r:sdcardfs:s0 (from path /sdcard/gb.apk, context u:r:system_server:s0)" then you didn't place the APK in a folder that PM (package manger) is allowed to install APKs from.<br />
<b> </b><br />
Now check from inside gboard that you have the old 7.9.7 version, and not the new buggy one that you previously had. Everything should work perfectly, just like it did before google screwed it up. Yay for "progress".<br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-30592903712102999122019-10-15T13:43:00.002-07:002020-01-28T13:01:07.336-08:00LG Stylo 5 VS Stylo 3 camera shootoutThe cameras on the Stylo 5 and Stylo 3 have the same resolution. But not all megapixels are made equal. Let's start with cropped images in a well-lit indoor shot so we can judge how sharp each image is. On the left is the Stylo 3, on the right, the Stylo 5.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiko7OrVwp9tgdqz1-Y4I8tTG-OU4AHsijjierWyfM3af1a1kpZ1DDrO1Xi1xgr20Q2tbQX8690fWK_vHXPFYq91-1u_KFvx6bygMcUR3xhtQcdGWGG-e9wnp1ycPk3siQntAgcMr84UA/s1600/Stylo+3+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1072" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiko7OrVwp9tgdqz1-Y4I8tTG-OU4AHsijjierWyfM3af1a1kpZ1DDrO1Xi1xgr20Q2tbQX8690fWK_vHXPFYq91-1u_KFvx6bygMcUR3xhtQcdGWGG-e9wnp1ycPk3siQntAgcMr84UA/s400/Stylo+3+%25281%2529.jpg" width="267" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Stylo 3</td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzdHRlNkolHvb8xn9tvryASyDBCT3iYS4bC-A9pXHRP0CGg308cTCi1hU-4Lqk-jj43AaLLTQk9JS6LbwV6nrxDjXjjNvPLxO8jmnNRTs8EF4eFQJCO5M5HC08bdppfwVsdBLE8umD5A/s1600/stylo5+%25282%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1038" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzdHRlNkolHvb8xn9tvryASyDBCT3iYS4bC-A9pXHRP0CGg308cTCi1hU-4Lqk-jj43AaLLTQk9JS6LbwV6nrxDjXjjNvPLxO8jmnNRTs8EF4eFQJCO5M5HC08bdppfwVsdBLE8umD5A/s400/stylo5+%25282%2529.jpg" width="258" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Stylo 5</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
You can click for the full-sized image. But even at this tiny scale you can tell the stylo 5 is sharper than the 3, and has better contrast (less washed out).<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<hr />
Interestingly, on the full-sized version of these photos the Stylo 3 made a 4.1MB file, whereas the Stylo 5 produced a 3.5MB file. More details and a smaller file to boot. So we know this isn't just a matter of how much data the camera is saving to disk (ahem, SD).<br />
<br />
Often budget cameras show their worst side in low-light. So here's a dark room with some glare from a window. Again, cropped to the center of the image (hiding the aforementioned window) to show detail.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgptO6jPNQPgNRSTxsgK3YxDTt0l3uFkFh45xnjtGrama87owUenuMkNI12sqcMwEtKjsprFQNabRsYGRVqWFGrSu_CTbSykKekHbFIpbUvchrE8qVe1lj5c0ZIXvaLf7DlqvOpcH-Rg/s1600/Stylo+3+%25285%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1528" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgptO6jPNQPgNRSTxsgK3YxDTt0l3uFkFh45xnjtGrama87owUenuMkNI12sqcMwEtKjsprFQNabRsYGRVqWFGrSu_CTbSykKekHbFIpbUvchrE8qVe1lj5c0ZIXvaLf7DlqvOpcH-Rg/s320/Stylo+3+%25285%2529.jpg" width="304" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">LG Stylo 3</td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-J99t6YcDJwMJAyNAOmKVr1RJE0IErujdcMVf5H2vmQt1NNYJq3YFfFDXDO6VWv1Z5AiGfgOItyO3v0u3EEPJ_yAaXPSp3rdQ2PdcPVyQS_6fnskdGKScQTXUgk0tQRyNAMo9BXcXIA/s1600/stylo5+%25285%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1443" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-J99t6YcDJwMJAyNAOmKVr1RJE0IErujdcMVf5H2vmQt1NNYJq3YFfFDXDO6VWv1Z5AiGfgOItyO3v0u3EEPJ_yAaXPSp3rdQ2PdcPVyQS_6fnskdGKScQTXUgk0tQRyNAMo9BXcXIA/s320/stylo5+%25285%2529.jpg" width="288" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">LG Stylo 5</td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
Even from the tiny preview it's clear there's a lot more detail in the 5. Click for larger views and you'll see just how large an improvement it is. Which is not to say the Stylo 5 is great, just much improved. My ancient Samsung Galaxy S7 still does much better (see some of my other posts for examples of this same shot on that camera).<br />
<br />
OK, so the difference in poor light is very noticeable. What about a better lit shot? Here are two photos showing a well-lit outdoor scene with strong shadows. No cropping here; these are the original jpgs.<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhI62wPNfdNSW8FdvxhNIrzwicFhIsBMnJ7DbNubRA1YEJKl_wErSqHGT_Z3elab8qg1kRIu5Upzpu4nnApwaO9n10QouzO9OmWgh3JJjJ-yAqkO1Q0UafzgmIl1TQEQ9ne09LycWN3lA/s1600/Stylo+3+%252811%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1200" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhI62wPNfdNSW8FdvxhNIrzwicFhIsBMnJ7DbNubRA1YEJKl_wErSqHGT_Z3elab8qg1kRIu5Upzpu4nnApwaO9n10QouzO9OmWgh3JJjJ-yAqkO1Q0UafzgmIl1TQEQ9ne09LycWN3lA/s320/Stylo+3+%252811%2529.jpg" width="240" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">3</td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaRb3cnUGtVQAwYUnG8YjlBqT75Si6jaXtU8IfbVAiAFjq7yJUt2g_Py4A7oiHgLf3eCDKZGThsAicKcl-Buii1ObMq7JkwgRq_mOZWGagZJAAe6uyNeA5YkTbHiMwnchOh9IVjwKL6w/s1600/stylo5+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1200" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaRb3cnUGtVQAwYUnG8YjlBqT75Si6jaXtU8IfbVAiAFjq7yJUt2g_Py4A7oiHgLf3eCDKZGThsAicKcl-Buii1ObMq7JkwgRq_mOZWGagZJAAe6uyNeA5YkTbHiMwnchOh9IVjwKL6w/s320/stylo5+%25281%2529.jpg" width="240" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">5</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Both do pretty well. The 3 does a better job of preserving shadow detail (both phones had HDR on, BTW), but at a cost of looking more washed out overall. The 5 has nicer and more realistic colors. If you zoom in to 100% sized pixels, you'll see the detail level is nearly identical; certainly not enough to care about.<br />
<br />
To conclude: the Stylo 5 is an upgrade over the 3, particularly in low light. Thus, indoor shots almost always look better. Well lit outdoor shots are not really that different between the two, though one might prefer the 3 or 5 depending on your taste. The 3 does tend toward washed out, less saturated colors in most shots. The 5 has better color and is always when there's no harsh shadows. In dramatically lit scenes the small loss in shadow details is detectable, however, even with HDR on.<br />
<br />
BUT: the Stylo 5 is still nowhere near flagship camera quality (even flagship from 4 years ago). It might be good enough, though. <br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-51150201331888750642019-09-03T15:17:00.000-07:002020-01-28T13:01:17.805-08:00Lg Stylo 5 form factor: good and badI like how big the screen is. No question, it looks great. The borders and bezzles are reasonably slim, too. But the phone is so big, and pretty heavy too. I actually have found myself gravitating back to my Stylo 3 because it's so much lighter and fits in my hand better.<br />
<br />
It's definitely not a one-handed phone. Even when using both hands I find it more comfortable to cradle it in both hands, like a book. For typing this is a very ergonomic approach. And the keyboard is so wide that two thumb typing is a pleasure. In fact I'm using it now to write this and while it's nowhere near as fast as a desktop keyboard it's the first time I've found soft-key typing to be pleasant. No reason to dig out the stylus. Just tap away with your thumbs.<br />
<br />
What's much less ergonomic is holding the phone with one hand and navigating apps/the web with the other. The weight, width, and depth just don't combine pleasently in my average-sized hands. Mostly, it's that the phone is so deep (thick) and the edges are close to square. Combined with the weight, the result cramps my hand. This is the largest phone I've used so I can't make good comparisons, but I know the Stylo 3 was just fine.<br />
<br />
I'm also really disappointed about the stylus slot in the 5. Unless you have unusually large nails it's lodged too deep in the phone to remove. I find myself just not using it at all. I didn't pull the stylus out of the 3 all the time but I did use it (it was really nice for some games and for drawing). It's just not worth the trouble on the 5. Partly because the screen is so large. UI widgets and virtual keys are so large you just don't need it.<br />
<br />
The speaker volume is good, and the sound is clear enough. I'm glad it's bottom firing, as opposed to on the back - you can set the phone down and not muffle it any.<br />
<br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-66844013411860965032019-09-03T14:53:00.002-07:002020-01-28T13:01:30.721-08:00Lg Stylo 5 sample photos<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiF8Y6YZkre2OSPpFqcbeut0o57Bd82ARNcK6mRpKHqFiu3I-sVHBUkhHDi8cpHp5MXNoG9vobDoZi5zl1-dud_iBkVaQEygb9hIqfVkUS83rTfIqLtEszTBRlgE6QaFFnnRrCYcDk_EvaQ/s1600/20190903_142404_HDR.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1200" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiF8Y6YZkre2OSPpFqcbeut0o57Bd82ARNcK6mRpKHqFiu3I-sVHBUkhHDi8cpHp5MXNoG9vobDoZi5zl1-dud_iBkVaQEygb9hIqfVkUS83rTfIqLtEszTBRlgE6QaFFnnRrCYcDk_EvaQ/s640/20190903_142404_HDR.jpg" width="480" /></a></div>
<br />
Pretty good details in this high contrast outdoor shot.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-34511838159840058482019-08-08T11:10:00.004-07:002019-08-08T11:10:38.699-07:00LG Stylo 5 vs the Stylo 3: a quick review after 1 full week of useI've had a Stylo 5 for a full week. It's natural to compare it to my Stylo 3, which I've had for over a year. My Stylo 3 has been a better phone than it deserved to be for the price ($50), and I've only grown more fond of it over time. If it were just a bit faster and had a decent camera I'd be happy to use it as my primary phone. <br /><br />Enter the Stylo 5, which on paper is both those things. (I skipped the Stylo 4 because it was too expensive for most of its life for what it offered). What follows are my hands-on experiences with the 5. All numbers are self-measured, using calipers or other fine instruments. Lots of websites publish inaccurate
measurements. These are at least accurate to the sample I own!<br /><br /><div>
So what's it like? Lots has changed, not all of it good. The screen is much taller (142mm vs 126mm). Part of that is smaller bezels, but also the phone itself is slightly taller (161 vs 155mm). The screen is the same width in both cases: 70mm (the 5's body is 79mm wide and the 3 is 80mm). A little taller doesn't count for much, but the phone is also noticeably thicker (9mm vs 7.9mm). That doesn't sound like a lot but it feels like it. Perhaps the 3 has a more gently rounded back cover? Whatever. In your hand the 5 feels much thicker. Finally, weight. The 5 is much heavier: 180g, vs the 3 at only 149g. This I also really feel. Combined, the weight and thickness of the 5 really makes the "hand-feel" much less nice than the 3. I actually can feel my hand getting tired holding it for extended periods of time. Sorry, I guess I'm just a weakling. Maybe with time I'll grow used to it, but this is definitely the most disappointing aspect of the 5. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Let's counter that with the most impressive aspect: the screen. It's super high res, at 1080x2160, vs 1280 x 720 for the Stylo 3. That makes a difference you can definitely see in terms of sharpness. While a flagship might be even sharper, the returns are surely diminishing. It's also plenty bright and colorful.<br /><br />Performance is great. Websites load quickly and scroll smoothly. We have finally reached the age where a budget chipset is more than enough. That said developers at Google and elsewhere are always hard at work adding bloat. Luckily, the Stylo range never gets OS updates so you'll never have to experience added bloat. But you say, who cares about how it "feels". What about cold hard benchmarks? The Stylo 5 gets a geekbench score of 753 (single), 3789 (multi) when plugged in. My Stylo 3 gets 649/1815. I'd say the multi-core score is more reflective of the actual experience. <br /><br />Storage. The Stylo comes with 32gb of storage. Sounds like a lot but after uninstalling what Boost bloat you can, only 14gb are available for you. In fact Boost isn't adding that much - the OS takes up a full 16gb. Thanks, Google. It's sad to think how much baggage the Android OS drags around now. Overdeveloped. That's Android. So much has changed since KitKat, and so little of it for any good reason. <br /><br /><div>
Not that 14gb is so little space to play with. Certainly enough for your apps. And there is a SD card slot, so while the wastefulness of Android is offensive, in practice just spend $10 on a SD card for your music and photos, etc. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
So that's my 1 week review. I'll post another more fully developed review in another week or so. </div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-3521978940657821102019-05-12T15:22:00.000-07:002019-05-12T15:24:49.567-07:00Bubble Counter floats above other apps<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-E1eGBAb0JH2MCxuO1KYj7x6ng-iIkZ16oyskaK_hUKJse5rhGh413KtjSLEO3VVzEdgRKrv3V9GQcsT6iEeJWyv_HD_lmwRQKkpXsCdmYGN8TFqxyJ9pDXhY3MXhkLox_1JR_-UGPQ/s1600/Screenshot_2019-05-12-15-06-16%255B1%255D.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1280" data-original-width="720" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-E1eGBAb0JH2MCxuO1KYj7x6ng-iIkZ16oyskaK_hUKJse5rhGh413KtjSLEO3VVzEdgRKrv3V9GQcsT6iEeJWyv_HD_lmwRQKkpXsCdmYGN8TFqxyJ9pDXhY3MXhkLox_1JR_-UGPQ/s400/Screenshot_2019-05-12-15-06-16%255B1%255D.png" width="225" /></a>This app makes it easy to count something (reps, in my case) while using any app. If it looks familiar, it's because I previously reviewed an almost identical app that differed in how you closed the bubble and reset the count. I like the gesture based interface of this version better. The picture at right shows the settings but to be clear after you close that the green counter remains for you to position where you please. Free/no ads, but there's a paid version with more features which you should probably buy to support the developer!<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.alan.bubbleCounter&hl=en_US">Bubble Tally Counter (0.1MB, $0.0)</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-61133420497020156332019-05-12T15:16:00.002-07:002019-05-12T15:24:58.619-07:00Excellent scientific calculator, free no ads<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHYqVFZfwBWZuedNfIMjiozgOpPTJvqF6-2FS2bif-nSRbM0urwqj9RNzC0OQaXhzl6MO07K2XfsuUXNicc3CuZ27rdaJ14jZRRM766Mix0UIepIItOuwuQmXOhWYSlA66ZpMMZMJdOw/s1600/Screenshot_2019-05-12-15-02-58%255B1%255D.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1280" data-original-width="720" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHYqVFZfwBWZuedNfIMjiozgOpPTJvqF6-2FS2bif-nSRbM0urwqj9RNzC0OQaXhzl6MO07K2XfsuUXNicc3CuZ27rdaJ14jZRRM766Mix0UIepIItOuwuQmXOhWYSlA66ZpMMZMJdOw/s400/Screenshot_2019-05-12-15-02-58%255B1%255D.png" width="225" /></a></div>
The android OS has a very basic calculator built in, but it's pretty lacking. I really like this one, which has all the normal scientific calculator features you'd expect, a good history display, and puts commas after every 3 digits, like a good little calculator. <br />
<br />
No ads, no nags. There is a paid version for $1 that adds some features that frankly I don't miss. But it's probably worth supporting high quality work like this one.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.shaytasticsoftware.calctasticfree&hl=en_US">CalcTastic Scientific Calculator (3MB, $0.00)</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-11179096261366884862018-12-08T16:42:00.002-08:002019-04-29T12:05:32.790-07:00Samsung Galaxy J7 Sky Pro: a nice mid-range phone but no flagship like the S7Specs: 5.5" LCD, 2GB RAM, 9GB free storage, Android 6, 3300mAh battery. <br />
<br />
The Samsung J7 Sky Pro is a mid-range option from tracfone; I purchased a refurb unit from them and it only cost $60, which is a pretty good deal. The refurb quality was excellent: I couldn't tell it from a brand new phone except that it shipped in a white box. No scratches, or marks, and it appears to come with a brand new battery.<br />
<br />
With a name like "J7" it seems particularly appropriate to compare this to another Samsung phone: the S7, which just happens to be my primary phone. I'll also compare to an LG stylo, another "phablet" that's closer in price to the J7.<br />
<br />
<b>Body</b>. At 152x76.2x7.6mm the phone is large but not painful by any means. One handed use is possible, but doesn't exactly make my thumb happy. I prefer the S7 in that regard, which is only 70mm wide. The J7 has .4" larger LCD, so that extra width (and height) is necessary. The J7 is noticeably smaller than the Stylo 3 (155x80x7.4mm), even though the LCD is only 0.2" smaller, so they did a pretty good job of fitting a large LCD into a small package. Furthermore, the J7 has a hardware home button and back buttons, so the USABLE LCD is actually slightly larger on the J7 than the Stylo. Well played, Samsung. The J7 has a removable back cover, and behind that is a removable battery. It's not clear how much deeper you could go as there are no screws revealed, but I suspect the phone is nonetheless more repairable for it. The back of the phone also has a lightly grippy rubber finish that feels good in my hand, kind of like the old Moto X2 "soft touch" model. I don't want to oversell this: there are definitely more grippy cases out there, but out of the box the J7 is nicer to hold than most glass-covered or metal flagships (such as my S7). Phones are getting more and more alike with every day, so it's nice to see something different, and the J7 is just slightly different, IMHO for the better. <b>A-</b>.<br />
<br />
<b>LCD/display. </b>The IPS LCD is bright and has great viewing angles, and the color looks good. It only runs at 720x1280 but text was plenty sharp and clear. Compared to the OLED S7 the blacks weren't as dark, but for an LCD it actually had great contrast. There's no ambient light sensor, so you'll have to manually adjust how bright the screen is. Kind of amazing they left that out.<br />
<br />
I tried to compare how much more you could see on a 5.5" LCD than on my S7's 5.1", and found it difficult. It seems that the phones have rather different ideas of how larger text should be scale in chrome and elsewhere. While both the J7 and S7 feature settings sliders to scale interface elements up or down, setting the J7 to the minimum didn't result in the same text density that I've grown to prefer on my S7. Thus you see less text on the J7's larger screen! I'm starting to wonder if this is a tracfone thing, since several of their phones seem to err on the side of oversized text/UI. Nonetheless the difference isn't a big deal. <b>B</b>.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7AMoZMYRWbAwGrjD3bKhwyyxlX9ipFIzumMZu_7NKxYfxFiZp_erteISXLpwRP2m0Lnd7Vma8AHVLxmwt_UktvVVPisD7EyBf4r7qayUuq7eOB1uIgxmbNSef46Eawgty5syf0fG3cGf8/s1600/j7-text-and-lcd-size.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="955" data-original-width="1474" height="414" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7AMoZMYRWbAwGrjD3bKhwyyxlX9ipFIzumMZu_7NKxYfxFiZp_erteISXLpwRP2m0Lnd7Vma8AHVLxmwt_UktvVVPisD7EyBf4r7qayUuq7eOB1uIgxmbNSef46Eawgty5syf0fG3cGf8/s640/j7-text-and-lcd-size.jpg" width="640" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Performance. </b>With a Snapdragon 625 and 2GB of RAM I had decent hopes for this. And indeed, it was good enough. Chroming around the web was perfectly pleasant. Scrolling felt smooth and page time loading was fine, even though I'm accustomed to the S7, which according to benchmarks should be amazingly more snappy. Speaking of benchmarks: Geekbench single core 648, Multi 1696. My S7 turns in 1720/3900, but certainly doesn't feel 3x faster. No doubt I would always choose the S7 but the J7 is fast enough. This was my first time with the 625, and I was expecting it to be faster than the equivalent 400 series CPU, but benchmarks didn't agree. My Stylo 3 has a 425 and it gets 649/1815. <b>B</b>.<br />
<br />
<b>Multimedia</b>: Youtube video was stutter free. The only speaker fires out the right side of the phone which is very odd. And unbalanced. Not that the standard bottom firing speaker of the S7 is really any less "balanced", except that we have all become used to "bottom heavy" sound, not sound biased to the left or right of the screen. Actually, hold on - flip your phone into landscape mode and your "bottom" firing speaker is now a right side speaker. So I think it comes down to taste, and nothing more. The speaker is (very) loud and clear and even has a hint of bass. And the 3.5mm headphone jack provides a much preferable alternative to dongle-land a la Steve.<b> A</b>.<br />
<br />
<b>OS/software</b>. It runs Android 6.0 and has most of the same Samsung tweeks that my S7 does, despite my S7 running 7.1. I felt at home and didn't miss anything from the newer OS releases. All the settings and apps I was used to on my S7 were there. So if you like the Samsung Way, this phone delivers. 6.0 might seem like an old OS but nothing really important has changed in a long time in Android and indeed some of the changes in 8.0 are back-steps if you are a power user. So I'm 100% ok with the software as provided. Some bloatware was also installed but nothing major, and "OK Google" support was also good. <b>B</b>.<br />
<br />
<b>Camera. </b>Without a doubt the biggest sacrifice on budget phones these days is the camera. If you've ever looked inside a phone you'd see the camera hardware is tiny and just plugs into the motherboard, suggesting that user swappable cameras would be possible in an alternate reality. I'd certainly pay for another S7 camera to install in my Stylo 3, for instance. Esp. since they should be dirt cheap on the used market given the age of the S7.<br />
<br />
The J7, being a more mid-line model, does better than the cheapo budget phone. Let's compare it to the Stylo 3 and S7. In this high contrast Xmass shot the J7 and Stylo are nearly tied, and the S7 looks fantastic as always. Note: photos are cropped to show more of the fine detail you would see when zooming about 2x into your photos. <br />
<br />
<table><tbody>
<tr><td><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAuOo2tbcx7oCb5qwZAiBgOu4jVr8qjLb5n3FcjXXvm_DxXPt0X7JqcN70ENsSs6XmR11v-2m59xgqi-dj9WWOU7tf8_QZlPZ_MLYqbbIqJLXsw6vPLqqaHPNm8NQ11EEiDUcXbKTUiBbd/s1600/j7-20181208_132637.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="738" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAuOo2tbcx7oCb5qwZAiBgOu4jVr8qjLb5n3FcjXXvm_DxXPt0X7JqcN70ENsSs6XmR11v-2m59xgqi-dj9WWOU7tf8_QZlPZ_MLYqbbIqJLXsw6vPLqqaHPNm8NQ11EEiDUcXbKTUiBbd/s400/j7-20181208_132637.jpg" width="183" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
</td><td><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhz_jvofJJODrfzDL-7wh7NilBM2iqRA89_yYQPbh2GEBBsLrLWj1WRq9R3vxrlGxZKcLhpQ0fMol-y7obqhzNakOLLj7uV1r7q0mJY2hzKj_XfIiVy7Uflx9WrCpWX0Fakj0jl2Z4Y4NEn/s1600/s3-20181208_132638_Burst01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="664" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhz_jvofJJODrfzDL-7wh7NilBM2iqRA89_yYQPbh2GEBBsLrLWj1WRq9R3vxrlGxZKcLhpQ0fMol-y7obqhzNakOLLj7uV1r7q0mJY2hzKj_XfIiVy7Uflx9WrCpWX0Fakj0jl2Z4Y4NEn/s400/s3-20181208_132638_Burst01.jpg" width="165" /></a></td><td><div a="" class="separator" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZQFGx7XxQNXsUuE4hrOwqk4b4u9AlLutvWWUkg19Fzuj77IPHufHuqC2Fd616Pjj7HCpAD4pFrA1xKSvE38ectD3pIfmcH7WRZFC48xnSCCZts2ikfgFl_R1Z__zzqmP_wcDnUhH_X8Hd/s1600/s7-20181208_132758.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;">
<img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="700" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZQFGx7XxQNXsUuE4hrOwqk4b4u9AlLutvWWUkg19Fzuj77IPHufHuqC2Fd616Pjj7HCpAD4pFrA1xKSvE38ectD3pIfmcH7WRZFC48xnSCCZts2ikfgFl_R1Z__zzqmP_wcDnUhH_X8Hd/s400/s7-20181208_132758.jpg" width="175" /></div>
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
What about lower light photography? Here the J7 does seem to pull ahead of the Stylo 3, providing higher contrast and more natural colors, but not really more detail.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<img border="0" data-original-height="843" data-original-width="1600" height="210" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhN5RikJjQyV1ssEhgF852cu3qxZ06BaPjAAVHUIvQGjCQTTySii9Qd9K-I40wdqBtysmSblcj5GR3CZ2d9kEm3zEIGPCKwkscM9uA_f6W8MJ8UlLHd9PZXAQaKu2AAH1rAIm14buY3gnnf/s400/j7+20181208_133048.jpg" width="400" /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilKVuuhtaNEaFOtgLBNgt1N7dO7knYTwjpB2gCQByueSmEciL1oLywH24Fc3pa0qKHQHkGPVukkjVVzrrKCrdW0rJovnHJwg_zXq_I7TnbD98OsXOj2Dfq_3buUB7H354ivxnRcD-zQd-P/s1600/s3+20181208_133109_HDR.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="936" data-original-width="1440" height="260" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilKVuuhtaNEaFOtgLBNgt1N7dO7knYTwjpB2gCQByueSmEciL1oLywH24Fc3pa0qKHQHkGPVukkjVVzrrKCrdW0rJovnHJwg_zXq_I7TnbD98OsXOj2Dfq_3buUB7H354ivxnRcD-zQd-P/s400/s3+20181208_133109_HDR.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZzLwD-pI-EDjqrpYWumbXjh5T2EowU_fpFAapLzxD02Yvwe7lCXtJf6-AjtMZyJ-aFtHhv-37vV0KcENC8zc30oBgkLOOLtI-qX3pOwbQ_ldsDLhR8HvxBaoqFElS6DGuzOwTeEusvdcn/s1600/s7+20181208_133046.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1032" data-original-width="1440" height="286" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZzLwD-pI-EDjqrpYWumbXjh5T2EowU_fpFAapLzxD02Yvwe7lCXtJf6-AjtMZyJ-aFtHhv-37vV0KcENC8zc30oBgkLOOLtI-qX3pOwbQ_ldsDLhR8HvxBaoqFElS6DGuzOwTeEusvdcn/s400/s7+20181208_133046.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
But excuse me for a second while I fall in love with my S7 all over again. I mean there's no comparison. Detail, color, contrast. All so much superior. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Given how little improvement the J7 is over the Stylo I'm just going to show two last sets of S7 vs J7 shots. J7 on the left, S7 on the right. But if you forget, just assume that whichever photo looks best must be the S7. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Actually... With lots of light the J7 does just fine on this comparison. Extreme dark and light detail are lost, but the overall photo looks good. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<table><tbody>
<tr><td><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYF-wBkQewVI51pcN7lq2wiG-pr6lxLEsMVospQ1-NAdBp2S1N-J23VdFnn6iQgl_PP1NI7rh7exHEbczyBzpf2bgO404J8xIrAWxEArT-QmU_4VzuKRJi0F-IopUL1usEtnteDmJXLfRS/s1600/j7+20181208_133222.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1200" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYF-wBkQewVI51pcN7lq2wiG-pr6lxLEsMVospQ1-NAdBp2S1N-J23VdFnn6iQgl_PP1NI7rh7exHEbczyBzpf2bgO404J8xIrAWxEArT-QmU_4VzuKRJi0F-IopUL1usEtnteDmJXLfRS/s400/j7+20181208_133222.jpg" width="300" /></a></div>
<br /></td><td><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtELjY4a_rq7SYYOc_ex_G34SZGd689miQyBxjb0dvc1L__qnGuQ3ltHc1QCd2JDmDwGRJQUqb0_CzO-y3BIt3R0xW_1P8TnWjLk4KPiSdK3N5WBewlVUhKZ99nsqAh3WfbuIiujmRm-3y/s1600/s7+20181208_133215.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="900" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtELjY4a_rq7SYYOc_ex_G34SZGd689miQyBxjb0dvc1L__qnGuQ3ltHc1QCd2JDmDwGRJQUqb0_CzO-y3BIt3R0xW_1P8TnWjLk4KPiSdK3N5WBewlVUhKZ99nsqAh3WfbuIiujmRm-3y/s400/s7+20181208_133215.jpg" width="225" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
</div>
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgu_KJOCOtm7GOnAh_wLilWoISLynxGq77EBxre5USGBmUsbNBk2R_sk5NTXh2qtNiK80qYOqpVxVOIxyVG2-HAaCfu2Td1OtV3RW8x_gj1bh81a3v7klr0JE7lINkQoJZbs2b6tuHu-Xbg/s1600/j7+20181208_133823.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1200" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgu_KJOCOtm7GOnAh_wLilWoISLynxGq77EBxre5USGBmUsbNBk2R_sk5NTXh2qtNiK80qYOqpVxVOIxyVG2-HAaCfu2Td1OtV3RW8x_gj1bh81a3v7klr0JE7lINkQoJZbs2b6tuHu-Xbg/s320/j7+20181208_133823.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBMRJlByDGPuOP8ZBwn_mi3uGhpm4yL077_zdlIOzpzNErPl2AKd3P3mEYmxLjfx7KsrZ3daIeJ85fvMzVZsrvbCI2NwmgeWZSSXRB3Ol24cCWL3qMOooVDox0pPhnxqfPDOI-qlPSbpjZ/s1600/s7+20181208_133822.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="900" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBMRJlByDGPuOP8ZBwn_mi3uGhpm4yL077_zdlIOzpzNErPl2AKd3P3mEYmxLjfx7KsrZ3daIeJ85fvMzVZsrvbCI2NwmgeWZSSXRB3Ol24cCWL3qMOooVDox0pPhnxqfPDOI-qlPSbpjZ/s320/s7+20181208_133822.jpg" width="180" /></a><br />
The cat looks pretty good in either photo, so I guess the J7 is Cat Certified and good to go! But what about those barrels in the back? That home depot orange really shines thru in the S7, whereas the J7 completely overexposes it. I mean, both cameras took a good photo of what you really care about here. Unless maybe you work in construction...<br />
<br />
Overall camera rating: C+. Better than the worst budget shooter, but not much better than the average $100 phone.<br />
<br />
<br />
<h2>
Conclusion</h2>
I liked this phone, but not so much the camera. As a budget model it delivers as well as any other phone in the $100 price range, but with a bigger (effective) LCD than average. As long as you ignore the camera this phone will certainly do the job for most folks but it's a long way from being flagship class, even when compared to the flagships of 2016 (the Samsung Galaxy S7).</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-42472882294642845152018-11-03T10:34:00.000-07:002019-10-15T14:24:46.398-07:00LG Rebel 2: hands on with a decent super-budget phone (lgl58vl)Specs: 5" IPS LCD, Snapdragon 210 CPU with 1GB RAM, 3GB usable storage. <br />
<br />
This budget phone lists for $40, but a refurb that looks 100% like new cost me $10. It's locked to tracfone, but they aren't a bad budget provider. I didn't use there service so I'm only reviewing the phone here. I'm generally pretty hard on it, but of course for $10 it is actually quite fabulous<b> </b>compared to any other $10 tech device that isn't a phone. Of course that's because phone economics are pretty crazy and because tracfone surely subsidizes the price.<br />
<br />
It runs Android 6 (marshmallow) which is old but it really that doesn't matter much - any app you care about will be written to work all the way back to 4.4. I'm sure they made that choice because marshmallow is less resource intensive.<br />
<br />
<b>Shape</b>: It has a removable plastic back, a removable battery, and fits nicely in your hand(73x144x8 mm). The back has a pleasing texture that makes it nicer to hold than most flagships. I prefer the feel of the Motorola G3, and perhaps even the ZTE Majesty ProPlus since both are a bit more gripy, but this is good too. Under the removable back are actual Philips screws, so you could disassemble this pretty easily (such as to replace the screen).<b> </b>The bezels are as large as $10 predicts and while there's plenty of space for hardware home/back buttons, they insist on wasting valuable LCD space instead. It continues LG's odd choice of power in the back, but also supports double tap on/double tap off, which works well.<b> A-</b> <br />
<br />
<b>Storage </b>is mediocre with only 3GB free. There is a SD card slot, but the phone only supports it as portable storage (not adoptable), meaning you will have to install all apps to internal memory and then cross your fingers that you can move them to the SD card (many won't). <b>C</b><br />
<br />
<b>Performance was OK</b>. Webpages loaded much slower than my S7, depending on complexity, sometimes taking more than a second. But some webpages are pigs. If you didn't have a flagship phone to compare to, you'd still probably wish it was faster, but it's certainly usable. Once the page loaded scrolling was smooth - unless the page was busy loading advertisements and running complex java-script, in which case there were certainly hiccups. The modern web is an insult to the hypertext aspirations of the 90s. Interestingly, the LG actually rendered JPGs in chrome faster than on my S7. It turns out I hadn't updated chrome in a while, and after addressing that the S7 again won, though by a smallish margin. Good code maters.<br />
<br />
With only 1GB of RAM, switching between apps was slow too. Not unusable, but certainly very noticeable coming from the S7. Well, maybe learn to multi-task less. It's probably good for your brain. Or maybe look for lighter apps? If only the play store also factored efficiency into the rankings... <br />
<br />
But enough about how it performs in real life - what about benchmarks?! Everybody loves benchmarks. The CPU is a lowly snapdragon 210 4core at 1.1ghz. Geekbench 4 reports 392 single/ 900 multi-core. That's about what other 210-based phones get, if perhaps a little low on the multi-core. Let's compare that to the LG Stylo 3, a 'dragon 430, which gets about 600/2500, which most people would also say is a low score, but is a pleasure to use as long as you don't compare it directly to my Samsung S7. To sum up: the synthetic benchmarks agree this is a slow phone. <b>B-</b><br />
<br />
<b>The LCD is reasonable</b>, at 5" diagonal, 854 x 480. Yes, it's IPS, so the viewing angles are good. On some webpages it seemed like faint lines got washed out, but viewing full-color high saturation photos everything looked fine. I decided to pit it against my Samsung S7, a fair comparison if ever there was one ;-). Amazingly, the S7 didn't <i>always </i>look better when viewing photos, though it frequently came out on top. It took extreme viewing angles (70+ degrees off normal) for the S7 to clearly win. Reading text at arm's length (~1ft) everything looked good and my visual acuity was more of a limit than screen resolution. At 0.5ft or less the grid of pixels started to be faintly visible producing a mild screen-door effect. I've used other low-resolution phones like the LG Volt and not had this problem, so I suppose there may be a tiny amount of space <i>between </i>the pixels. You get use to it and it never interferes seeing whats on the screen, but it's another mild reminder of the budget nature of this phone.<b> A- </b>(but read on)<br />
<br />
One much more unfortunate aspect of the phone is that the default text size and icons seem to be too large by a significant amount - as though this is a phone for grandma (no offense!). Compared to a Moto G3, for instance (the same size screen), everything is just too big. Given how giant everything looks, I think this might actually be a bug. You can adjust the text size under settings but it doesn't scale the rest of the interface so you end up getting silly things like menus with tiny text and huge amounts of white space above and below each line. There is a fix, which is to change the DPI, which changes all display elements, not just text. But LG didn't make this available under settings, unlike other phones I've used.<br />
<br />
Luckily there's a method to <a href="https://android.gadgethacks.com/how-to/change-your-androids-screen-resolution-without-root-access-0160439/" target="_blank">change your DPI using ADB</a> (no root required!). If that sounds like gibberish then this probably isn't for you. Read the link for the details, but if you already know all about ADB, here's the relevant command to scale everything properly: <b>adb shell wm density 200</b> (the default is 240). The screenshots below compare the default to density 200. And good news: this setting survives between reboots. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZyB_bFdC9AKj94E5FcU8TBg7nsAg-H8cCNt7pyRYYO3HBc3BB_eHOhVKqWKcFE5lZp4Y0MgKvcIiT9Hdr0ufuj6kjp6BN5n0ehmt99S8v7pf4K3ar12EYRzu1FjeUwoSpQEdkIPZkYQ/s1600/dpi-compare.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="858" data-original-width="965" height="568" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZyB_bFdC9AKj94E5FcU8TBg7nsAg-H8cCNt7pyRYYO3HBc3BB_eHOhVKqWKcFE5lZp4Y0MgKvcIiT9Hdr0ufuj6kjp6BN5n0ehmt99S8v7pf4K3ar12EYRzu1FjeUwoSpQEdkIPZkYQ/s640/dpi-compare.png" width="640" /></a></div>
See how a tiny change in scale almost doubles how much of the conversation you can read? That said hangouts is a particularly bad user of screen space, clearly designed for premium phablets, not 10 dollar phones for the masses.<br />
<br />
It's not just hangouts. Using the default DPI the screen feels much smaller than it is really, almost as cramped as a 4" screen, though most apps are not as bad as hangouts. Unless you have bad vision, or know how to ADB, it's hard to recommend this phone. You might say it's a small issue that I've overblown, but recall there are thousands of phones out there. Why choose one that's fundamentally flawed? To me the crampedness is much more an issue that some tiny LCD issues or the rather slow CPU performance. <b>F-</b>. OTOH, it's fixable for the techies. <b>A-</b><br />
<br />
Now that I've "failed" the phone it seems silly to spill to many more pixels, but since the DPI can be fixed, let's also check out the <b>camera</b>. Cheap phones always have a hard time with low light so let's look there first. Below is the Rebel2 vs the Samsung S7, a top performer of it's time. To compare I'm showing a crop at original resolution (the actual picture is about 2x wider/taller). The rebel can't handle the dynamic range or dark detail very well, and it's notable less wide-angle. But actually it does kindof OK here, since there's not much detail to see anyway. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiPwIDDuqc8xj8-fsgRF5gg73_UxgVpYRz8Wi_qRW0HHz5-uEm5ioGLwKHpGVWudkL0IcXsbV2aIYMhMjzNZgooX_HyAHo8v1g5bblhkqBbp5vmJ8-Y-WpLfrRZdyRKHh25T55sFpvzGw/s1600/halway-r2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1582" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiPwIDDuqc8xj8-fsgRF5gg73_UxgVpYRz8Wi_qRW0HHz5-uEm5ioGLwKHpGVWudkL0IcXsbV2aIYMhMjzNZgooX_HyAHo8v1g5bblhkqBbp5vmJ8-Y-WpLfrRZdyRKHh25T55sFpvzGw/s640/halway-r2.jpg" width="632" /></a></div>
This bookcase shot, also low light, really shows how bad the Rebel is. Since there's absolutely no comparing the detail level to the S7, I also added the LG Stylo3, a mid-range phone which can't hold a candle to the S7, but absolutely destroys the Rebel2. Note that all photos were taken at the same resolution, from the same spot, so the difference in scale is due to how wide-angle the lens is. You can certainly see more if you don't "Rebel" (again?).<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhksbhCOYn_yGJC2a8sMG6Dvs6-EbLgdPCGfFZzW1KrT4EOW0NiCKQ9lMkzlr92GasAzvduLa60xIOsSwxzd-n01sAfTM_Mvi8xEHD8QbAM4XaamDN1KdUdOAKVlE-nL-QCOdinOkeBWA/s1600/bookcase-r2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1545" data-original-width="1071" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhksbhCOYn_yGJC2a8sMG6Dvs6-EbLgdPCGfFZzW1KrT4EOW0NiCKQ9lMkzlr92GasAzvduLa60xIOsSwxzd-n01sAfTM_Mvi8xEHD8QbAM4XaamDN1KdUdOAKVlE-nL-QCOdinOkeBWA/s640/bookcase-r2.jpg" width="443" /></a></div>
Maybe a well lit indoor shot will do ok? This next photo was taken right under a skylight. Indeed, it may not be too dark, but boy is it blurry. <br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdW7rGvhJjiVc6YtjCMyjEduNr-CVteW7Phk0m56giNKgxKS7BF0b-EhXiIfFyJrSBuUlf0Cm8XTCLg2fLg7zMWC8m-kU1G0iIV64rOh1fF0hcEzyXhpC63O7fX_ygEWWA8WoKeqZ9DQ/s1600/door-reb2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1332" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdW7rGvhJjiVc6YtjCMyjEduNr-CVteW7Phk0m56giNKgxKS7BF0b-EhXiIfFyJrSBuUlf0Cm8XTCLg2fLg7zMWC8m-kU1G0iIV64rOh1fF0hcEzyXhpC63O7fX_ygEWWA8WoKeqZ9DQ/s640/door-reb2.jpg" width="532" /></a></div>
<br />
Ok I'm a horse torturer. Lets move on to an outdoors shot where the Rebel has enough light to "shine" (ha, ha). Actually I'm quite surprised how bad it does here too. There's just no detail even when you have tons of light. I was expecting something closer to the Stylo 3: No S7 but tolerable. But the Rebel is a mess. Blurry nearly everywhere, no shadow detail, just yukkk. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqzjtxXXgX6O8I6oKlrGq3t_1lFxPgf9TXoAD_CxIsFYRW5lE8hcdOXwk8oXC8snfiHnpskbXKB8XMzyMu5bfT0que4gWcfwFKUPIlCs1tL3Ov9uf6JAUp3lBXyECbnH6rsAABN0Im6Q/s1600/tree-r2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1158" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqzjtxXXgX6O8I6oKlrGq3t_1lFxPgf9TXoAD_CxIsFYRW5lE8hcdOXwk8oXC8snfiHnpskbXKB8XMzyMu5bfT0que4gWcfwFKUPIlCs1tL3Ov9uf6JAUp3lBXyECbnH6rsAABN0Im6Q/s640/tree-r2.jpg" width="462" /></a></div>
<br />
The specs claim 5MP, but I suspect it's really much lower and has
digital scaling applied. Even for a budget phone this is really bad. But
it <i>probably </i>beats my first digital camera from 2001, for one
40th the price. Progress! I mean, I'd use this instead of nothing, and
I'd be glad to have it. But you'd have a hard time finding worse sold
today. <b>D+</b><br />
<br />
<b>To conclude: </b>This phone is everything you should expect for $10. That's not even a decent meal anymore. I would have much rather been pleasantly surprised than have my expectations fulfilled, but for all my whining this is actually probably a good value for the price. But oh my goodness you could do better for just a few dollars more. <br />
<b></b><br />
<b> </b><br />
<b> </b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-79052685934704622972018-10-03T12:28:00.000-07:002018-11-02T21:39:36.770-07:00Redmi 6A Review: screen, performance, & camera evaluatedSpecs: 5.45" LCD, 2 Ghz CPU, 2GB RAM, 8GB free storage, unlocked GSM, Android 8.l<br />
<br />
This phone looks relatively premium but only cost $100 direct from China (but I did have to wait a full month for delivery). It features the tall + narrow form factor (18:9) first popularized by the Samsung S8, but without the curved LCD edges. At 147.5 x 71.5 x 8.3mm, it is only 3mm wider than the S8, and otherwise identical in size, but because the LCD doesn't curve around the edge of the phone the display is a full 0.3" smaller, at only 5.45". The phone body/back is made of plastic and is perhaps slightly slippery, but no more so than your typical phone. For the price it's an impressively large LCD in an impressively small and easy to hold phone. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjAe1DHL0tuDpClAWs_NM8jTYIwvwRm7GStsA2_mMkS0oJuqfWSdjf7mKQe66M4bcZrLpIMHU0vF6SBayoSnLsOaSeZ_6b-E1nK5-MvitzMjIbGh5EUJhrkzDb5pPfNXUC1LF5Fqt-7oA/s1600/6A+vs+S7.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1040" data-original-width="1034" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjAe1DHL0tuDpClAWs_NM8jTYIwvwRm7GStsA2_mMkS0oJuqfWSdjf7mKQe66M4bcZrLpIMHU0vF6SBayoSnLsOaSeZ_6b-E1nK5-MvitzMjIbGh5EUJhrkzDb5pPfNXUC1LF5Fqt-7oA/s400/6A+vs+S7.jpg" width="397" /></a>The LCD looks great, with great viewing angles as is the norm for IPS. It's plenty bright for indoor use, but perhaps a bit dark in full sunlight outside. The resolution is only 720 x 1440, half of the S8, but frankly that's plenty sharp. I think higher resolution screens are mostly specsmanship, and I'm glad Xiaomi "cut" that corner in the name of price. Even the tiniest of fonts are completely readable and appear sharp. What more do you want?<br />
<br />
On the flip side, the tall+narrow form factor allows a published screen size of 5.45" which sounds quite large, but doesn't deliver as much screen area per inch compared to the 16:9 form factor older phones. In this photo I'm comparing the 6A (left, 5.45") to the Samsung S7 (right, 5.1"). The red lines connect the respective corners of the two screens, showing just how much taller the 6A LCD is. Yet the S7 shows about 3 more lines of the webpage (green line). To be fair, it looks like the Chrome defaults result in a slightly larger font on the 6A, so with font tweaking the 6A might at least match the S7. To be even more fair, however, the 6A isn't showing the android navigation buttons, which I turned off for fun. Put those back on and the S7 wins hands-down due to it's hardware buttons that never occupy LCD space. While the 6A has a fairly narrow bottom bezzle there's clearly space for hardware home/back buttons down there. So while the the 6A has a very nice form factor that fits in my hand perfectly, it's no better than the older-style S7, which is 1mm narrower, less tall, AND has larger top/bottom bezzles, but still manages more usable screen space. All hail hardware buttons?? Ok, maybe it's just me that feels that way.<br />
<br />
To conclude on the screen + overall form factor: it's very nice, a solid "A". In this price range it's very hard to beat. The differences between this and the "dated" S7 design clearly come down to taste. Xiaomi did a great job here, though if I were in charge of design I would have made different tradeoffs.<br />
<br />
The Xiaomi android skin is called "MUI9" and I had heard many not-so-nice things about it. But in fact it's perfectly fine. Perhaps its been toned down, but it's really not so different from stock android and only in neutral or positive ways so far as I can see. One nifty feature is gesture navigation, which turns off the screen-wasting ever-present back/home buttons. Swipe up from the bottom to go home, or swipe up and hold to get to recently used apps. Swipe from the screen edges inwards (either side) to go back. It mostly works, though "go back" is not always recognized and can instead cause apps like maps to scroll around and lose your place. I'm giving it a solid try but I'll probably go back to on-screen buttons.<br />
<br />
Another nice feature is that you can have the phone display the current bandwidth consumed in the taskbar. It's interesting to see how much data is being pulled down all the time even when I'm looking at a "static" webpage. In general it seems like MUI9 mostly just adds tweaks that you can choose to enable or not. So I'm going to rate it "A", too.<br />
<br />
Ironically for a "phone" review I almost forgot to discuss call quality. Well it's fine. Just as good as any other phone I have used with T-mobile. Clear and plenty loud. I didn't want to burn thru all my data for the month but it did seem like the data speeds were slower than my S7, which makes sense: the 6A does not support as many GSM bands. On the other hand I don't have great T-mobile support at my house, despite living in a city. In general this is a weakness of the 6A: even though it's a GSM phone it doesn't support every band that a domestic phone would. And no Sprint/Verizon support at all. I'm giving the phone a tentative "B" here - more testing would have been nice, but since my main carrier is Sprint I don't have the option. <br />
<br />
From here on out things get less positive. What about performance? The MediaTek A22 (mt6762) quadcore runs at 2ghz, but those of you that recall the Pentium 4 know clock speeds are not all. The geekbench score is 816 single core, 2382 multicore. Interestingly, that's about the same as the snapdragon 800, also a quad core. For a more modern comparison, the snapdragon 430, a 8-core cpu, gets about the same mulicore performance from just 1.4ghz. Actually, I'm impressed that it benchmarks so well, because I find the webpage scrolling a bit jerky. Not slow exactly, but it stutters and the term "butter" doesn't come to mind. But hey, I'm comparing to a Samsung S7 here. Not fair! But I also have a LG Stylo 3 with a Snapdragon 425, and that's smoother too. That's a pretty fair comparison, and one that on Ghz alone you would expect the 6A to win. To be clear, this is a webpage issue only: scrolling in apps or the home-screen is indeed "buttery". And furthermore, the loading of webpages is perfectly snappy. The geekbench renderscript result, 1686, which measures GPU performance, was halfway between a snapdragon 425 and 430, which doesn't explain the jerky scrolling one bit. Conclusion: For the price it's quite good. But certainly not premium. "B".<br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; display: inline; float: none; font-family: "arimo" , "arial"; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;"></span><br />
How about multimedia? Youtube works smoothly and glitch free. Full-screen playback doesn't actually fill the screen, however, leaving black bars on the sides, because of the 18:9 aspect ratio. Yet another way in which 5.45" isn't really, but closer to a 5.0" display. Not to say the actual full-screen experience is too small, nor is this any different than for any 18:9 phone. Volume is satisfying - at max maybe too loud. But it's a bit tinny, my s7 has somewhat better bass, not that any phone does very good at that. Without going back and forth between them you'd never know. Unlike many "flagship" phones there's a real 3.5mm headphone jack, thank goodness. Overall, "A-".<br />
<br />
What about the camera? Here I'll compare to the S7, which had best in class performance back in 2016 when it was released, and the LG Stylo 3, an mid-line/budget phone with a camera to match. These are cropped ~3x zooms, meaning you are seeing the full resolution each camera, at least when viewed at 1920x1080.<br />
<br />
In full daylight the 6A does OK, but decidedly softer than the other two. Daylight is easy, though.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkAhHeO4v3te5xqp1GZ1UHqccqYmOeJLI06Vnc_fiSQRWHQWaFGxgePMSbrKB8naEj1xmUp92RIJ9s4HO-0DIQmEHCukjcn3uBG11DwhwhKFb4Hpqu1c9HtCR9dI16cWy56mrm2eeolg/s1600/outside+comparison.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="900" data-original-width="1600" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkAhHeO4v3te5xqp1GZ1UHqccqYmOeJLI06Vnc_fiSQRWHQWaFGxgePMSbrKB8naEj1xmUp92RIJ9s4HO-0DIQmEHCukjcn3uBG11DwhwhKFb4Hpqu1c9HtCR9dI16cWy56mrm2eeolg/s640/outside+comparison.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
In moderate indoor light, the S7 creams the 6A, but the 6A is still usable. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxjTijI4Qhm3SMgjtSOI-JjWp67A1lm1HWNSafknsseU7bykqeDzENwZW5i-RUJ6SWcGsbTfbHVqPqlvM6ATVGl8T7yOZNcLmnqIqMmI1JKrMQNHDEygzbOJoacaRIyIaUrtr2J8M3mQ/s1600/inside+medium+light.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="900" data-original-width="1600" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxjTijI4Qhm3SMgjtSOI-JjWp67A1lm1HWNSafknsseU7bykqeDzENwZW5i-RUJ6SWcGsbTfbHVqPqlvM6ATVGl8T7yOZNcLmnqIqMmI1JKrMQNHDEygzbOJoacaRIyIaUrtr2J8M3mQ/s640/inside+medium+light.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
In near dark, the 6A does horrible, the Stylo slightly better, and the S7 "shines", at least for a cell camera.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKahxCleR2EbM8Gn-eFV3UqBtPr6T0o_lDUD5JtiS5FohD4lNzXMsj7Zaffkjn8x0uc71fbwId2Fh7iYPI6O3_Z7TMgXZ6WauforxuUzN-mYVUBfzRUxCNoyR0mLFRshlAZQozkj6IVQ/s1600/near+dark.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="900" data-original-width="1600" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKahxCleR2EbM8Gn-eFV3UqBtPr6T0o_lDUD5JtiS5FohD4lNzXMsj7Zaffkjn8x0uc71fbwId2Fh7iYPI6O3_Z7TMgXZ6WauforxuUzN-mYVUBfzRUxCNoyR0mLFRshlAZQozkj6IVQ/s640/near+dark.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Recall that these are zoomed in photos, so the poor resolution and high blur is highlighted in these comparisons. Just looking at the photos on your phone without zooming and you'll see it too for lower light photos but not as much, and for full daylight photos everything looks fine. Consider these two unzoomed, uncropped photos.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhc98TJsuRbdfRvDKBVXoZ_0EAHaVz1A8fY-PBwXsZj16NRuoE7i_7JUmBLzA9vWCs-NSr8JsTHFFO8-JrXB6Z922IZb7ct6FQfbeIyxcMNeWOS19hChkclzOVryPI9jZBHbJUAzP7NDA/s1600/IMG_20181001_144841.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="900" data-original-width="1600" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhc98TJsuRbdfRvDKBVXoZ_0EAHaVz1A8fY-PBwXsZj16NRuoE7i_7JUmBLzA9vWCs-NSr8JsTHFFO8-JrXB6Z922IZb7ct6FQfbeIyxcMNeWOS19hChkclzOVryPI9jZBHbJUAzP7NDA/s640/IMG_20181001_144841.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaCboZQ3F12yU0kzExCVNgJsQYKzocBQhjpKVSPviDw_fN9_cA0fxjQQyIY16J7tc8ObH77irk8v4cRhbZL8gbFSda2qFVyQbjcbaeZkGsBSWIqvY_DfXMOevsYvqTcdkPBKC8PKPLfQ/s1600/IMG_20181001_144905.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="900" data-original-width="1600" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaCboZQ3F12yU0kzExCVNgJsQYKzocBQhjpKVSPviDw_fN9_cA0fxjQQyIY16J7tc8ObH77irk8v4cRhbZL8gbFSda2qFVyQbjcbaeZkGsBSWIqvY_DfXMOevsYvqTcdkPBKC8PKPLfQ/s640/IMG_20181001_144905.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
These are all the front facing camera. The back facing camera is actually a bit of a pleasant surprise. Depending on how much you like seeing your wrinkles, the 6A might be superior here.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnncv01EaN6I-A8Edhyphenhyphenmx0GQv16Ow2HBWZYr06IBQNaxW2dt20ASO8sZQfbTmOY3CgU94_tzfC6C2u7zAT1dwDbzCCf2b6rsRBkNMF0pVoInt5RotFwkSGN4cX7E16hkJ1n_bPvCAzvA/s1600/t2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="900" data-original-width="1600" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnncv01EaN6I-A8Edhyphenhyphenmx0GQv16Ow2HBWZYr06IBQNaxW2dt20ASO8sZQfbTmOY3CgU94_tzfC6C2u7zAT1dwDbzCCf2b6rsRBkNMF0pVoInt5RotFwkSGN4cX7E16hkJ1n_bPvCAzvA/s640/t2.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
To conclude: in daylight the 6A camera is certainly good enough for social media pics. Indoor lighting, less so. Be prepared to take multiple photos and save the least blurry ones. And in low light, forget about it! Side note: the Stylo 3 performs a lot better than I expected though nothing like a S7. Oddly enough, it seems today that the biggest difference between flagship and cheapo is the camera.<br />
<br />
There's an MicroSD card slot, a 3.5mm headphone port, and it uses the older microUSB connector. Like many Chinese phones it supports two nano sim cards, and refreshingly, there's still space for the MicroSD card slot when both sim cards are installed!<br />
<br />
To conclude: for $100 it's very nice. Walking into a best buy or Walmart you won't find anything nearly this nice for $100 and what you do find will be a pre-paid phone locked to some MNVO or another, whereas this phone is unlocked The biggest downside to the price is you have to wait a month to get it from china. <br />
<br />
If you'd like to see some <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRDkjcIvuGI" target="_blank">video of the Redmi 6A </a>check out this video on youtube. <br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-10143885707696412452018-10-01T09:41:00.003-07:002018-10-01T09:41:58.280-07:00World of goo: tapioca bridges make a great physics puzzle game<div class="mobile-photo">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIEyiVTDLhqK5ZujMh0TArctYvP_PZOC1P_8Tdu2aHwFlPh3LtAUwWMBOrKgIuDIkxXh3XGBqW0Kze_vzuBD5MlMjNPFS80_PtnWqjPteLyNzBFEyXjOjLOs_cdxsruM130GYJat5rqA/s1600/Screenshot_2018-08-31-18-29-57-775083.png" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="225" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_6596063779838276434" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIEyiVTDLhqK5ZujMh0TArctYvP_PZOC1P_8Tdu2aHwFlPh3LtAUwWMBOrKgIuDIkxXh3XGBqW0Kze_vzuBD5MlMjNPFS80_PtnWqjPteLyNzBFEyXjOjLOs_cdxsruM130GYJat5rqA/s400/Screenshot_2018-08-31-18-29-57-775083.png" width="400" /></a></div>
<div dir="ltr">
Price: $5 regularly, $1 sale (fairly often).</div>
<div dir="ltr">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr">
This very old game dates back to the Wii but is the perfect fit for a larger screen Android (do they make any other type these days?). A bridge building puzzler set in a nicely rendered fantasy world, this game mostly tests your wits as a structural engineer and general problem solver using the most unlikely building blocks: Cute good blobs joined by semi-rigid protoplasmic girders. The levels are often variations on how high a tower or how long a bridge you can build, factoring in many constraints from the environment of the level. The game keeps it fresh by throwing in some clever puzzles where the solution is far from obvious, but completely logical. There's also a decent story line and varied level graphics and designs. In the end it feels over too soon, after maybe 4 hours. </div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-46211814834061544852018-09-28T12:49:00.000-07:002018-11-02T21:39:49.596-07:00ZTE Majesty ProPlus: a budget phone to avoidPro Plus specs: 4.5" TN display with hardware buttons, 2GB RAM, 10GB free storage, snapdragon 210, android 7.1. Pro (not plus): 1GB Ram and only 2GB of free storage.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiRn1NCurqhzn0vMpfwz2OBlsZtkW-8MogklnCGThASjxPh8i2HOdu6UADZkDp17aXi72l4QdZsYdYnIoNzpjYLzQwWpRHdyX1maKEBd9mFhx9nLesk7JV987vO2kx-47rz5pa0iQQMg/s1600/zte+viewing+angles+suck.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="890" data-original-width="1228" height="460" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiRn1NCurqhzn0vMpfwz2OBlsZtkW-8MogklnCGThASjxPh8i2HOdu6UADZkDp17aXi72l4QdZsYdYnIoNzpjYLzQwWpRHdyX1maKEBd9mFhx9nLesk7JV987vO2kx-47rz5pa0iQQMg/s640/zte+viewing+angles+suck.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
This phone is super budget and they cut the one corner I cannot accept: it uses a TN display instead of IPS. That means the viewing angles are crap, and just the slightest wiggle of your hand results in significant color shifts and contrast reduction. Yuk. The resolution is actually high enough given the size, but with such ugly colors you won't care. And since it uses hardware navigation buttons you get to use the whole 4.5" for content. So that's something. <br />
<br />
If not for the LCD it would be a decent ultra budget phone for $30. Although it only has a quad core 1.1ghz cpu (snapdragon 210), it does have 2GB of RAM. Thus it's certainly slow, but it is usable. The geekbench score is 403 single, 1058 multi. That's almost a perfect match for the much older Snapdragon 400, a 1.4ghz 4-core chip. So at least it's more efficient at being slow!<br />
<br />
Youtube performance was fine if you can get beyond the crappy screen. The loudspeaker was loud (almost painful), and perhaps a hint of base at max volume, but also noticeably harsh. There was no problem with dropped frames.<br />
<br />
Website performance was fine - slashdot took forever to load but once loaded was actually reasonably smooth and loading a single smaller article view was in comparison snappy. In comparison to itself, that is. Any mid-level phone would do better and don't even think about comparing it to a flagship.<br />
<br />
The camera is crap, as you would expect. Even in good lighting it's dark. I'm not going to bother with an example photo. <br />
<br />
The phone has a removable plastic back made of a pleasantly textured and grippy rubber. In this one way it's actually far superior to ALL flagship phones. It's a bit reminiscent of the Motorola G3 back cover. Under the cover you can access the sim card and the MicroSD card. The battery is not removable which is disappointing in theory but in practice you'll not want to keep this long enough that it will ever mater.<br />
<br />
Model number ZTE Z899VL<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PgJZphxRPHE/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PgJZphxRPHE?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-40182363723710105172018-07-30T21:01:00.001-07:002019-05-12T15:25:11.636-07:00Keep track of exercise while entertaining yourself<div class="mobile-photo">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj9_emPE3UKuNqM0wHlyJCUa0rWAkLYmm1fdRm_b9h9uozE4KXYWr0xGw8T0j38hP1Q8XuLSzOVsbMSIEgEwad5vZ7L_mf7aDUbtm1I2VEbEzrTZsunsqG6G8-CyY2yqajSuwt9LGtFaA/s1600/Screenshot_2018-07-30-20-32-35-773310.png" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_6584223404417403890" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj9_emPE3UKuNqM0wHlyJCUa0rWAkLYmm1fdRm_b9h9uozE4KXYWr0xGw8T0j38hP1Q8XuLSzOVsbMSIEgEwad5vZ7L_mf7aDUbtm1I2VEbEzrTZsunsqG6G8-CyY2yqajSuwt9LGtFaA/s320/Screenshot_2018-07-30-20-32-35-773310.png" /></a></div>
<div dir="ltr">
I hate to exercise. It's tolerable if I have some entertainment, but then I have a hard time keeping track of my reps. I could use a mechanical tally keeper, but I prefer this app, which can keep track of reps while playing games or watching youtube. It floats on top in a little bubble off to the side and I can move it if it somehow gets in the way. </div>
<div dir="ltr">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr">
Its the little orange thing in the upper corner of the screen shot. </div>
<div dir="ltr">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr">
<a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.alan.floatingreps">Download Floating Rep Counter from google play store.</a>.</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-29380221978931341052018-07-22T09:58:00.000-07:002018-07-22T10:01:19.665-07:00Make your screen super dark for bedtime use<div class="mobile-photo">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgx1uliuoFHlKtdbexMf3ERy88I4M1AjNqv3uC3KdzKqHIhFcW3SCpiJYifs6xDyoJdTbuVKLTYXl67V66RDc2KxGWjHxyse8ZBoZB38f_05LnTuqcDWwOTyJgmpB2YPT1AlBa9A1HXyQ/s1600/Screenshot_2018-07-21-18-25-53-766195.png" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="400" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_6580852683997763186" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgx1uliuoFHlKtdbexMf3ERy88I4M1AjNqv3uC3KdzKqHIhFcW3SCpiJYifs6xDyoJdTbuVKLTYXl67V66RDc2KxGWjHxyse8ZBoZB38f_05LnTuqcDWwOTyJgmpB2YPT1AlBa9A1HXyQ/s400/Screenshot_2018-07-21-18-25-53-766195.png" width="225" /></a></div>
<div dir="ltr">
Evidence suggests that too much light before bed disrupts your circadian rythrms. Some people believe that blue light in particular is the cause but I think the case for that is shaky, and that it makes more sense by far to cut down on all wavelengths. </div>
<div dir="ltr">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr">
Now hold on, you say, my phone comes with a brightness slider already. </div>
<div dir="ltr">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr">
True. But I've found that in absolute darkness I can't get my phones dark enough with built in controls. </div>
<div dir="ltr">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr">
Enter <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.haxor&hl=en_US"><b>Screen Filter</b></a>, a free app that can make your screen dark. I mean really, really dark. You'll very quickly realize why your built-in brightness slider isn't doing enough: they are protecting you from yourself. In a bright room you can easily set the screen so dark you can't see anything. Including how to make it brighter again. Luckily they take a page from a bygon era of PCs, and automatically restore the screen to normal unless you confirm your setting within 10 seconds. </div>
<div dir="ltr">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr">
This app is free, has no ads, and works really well. I strongly recommend it for night time use. You might also be tempted to hope you could save battery life by turning down the brightness this way, but that's going to be hit or miss. If you have an OLED display that will probably work. If your display has a backlight, however, your battery probably won't benefit. This program works by inserting itself into the display pipeline, decreasing the pixel values just before rendering them to the LCD. Power consumption depends on the backlight, not pixel values. A side effect is that extreme levels of light reduction reduces the dynamic range of your display. In practice I haven't noticed this much, and even if it were worse it's a small price to pay for better sleep. </div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-9705266066817612652018-07-10T16:28:00.002-07:002019-05-12T15:25:20.461-07:00Multi Timer StopWatch: as many as you need at once<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh3c_nHqhKK1gSb_u5dCtjRaLKRlz5UPDyuutBCc-itbr_veqlINJoGXG6x5McYUlzsH3aDaiWX5aP1-ZwJ_oXacbtsF9fwuM3nD8SBrwRgWWY-E_TY0LqMwCZcjR5qJ4SlNwxIHkj2wQ/s1600/multi-stopwatch.png" imageanchor="1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: transparent; clear: left; color: #0066cc; float: left; font-family: &quot; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; margin-bottom: 16px; margin-right: 16px; orphans: 2; text-align: center; text-decoration: underline; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;"><img border="0" data-original-height="400" data-original-width="236" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh3c_nHqhKK1gSb_u5dCtjRaLKRlz5UPDyuutBCc-itbr_veqlINJoGXG6x5McYUlzsH3aDaiWX5aP1-ZwJ_oXacbtsF9fwuM3nD8SBrwRgWWY-E_TY0LqMwCZcjR5qJ4SlNwxIHkj2wQ/s320/multi-stopwatch.png" style="cursor: move;" width="188" /></a>Most phones have a countdown timer and stopwatch app built into the clock app, but this one is really an improvement if you need to keep track of multiple things. In my case I used it when I broke my leg to keep track of how long it had been since I took "as needed' pills and also to remind me of those that had to be taken on a fixed schedule.<br />
<br />
Here it shows just 4 stopwatches, but it supports an unlimited number (as well as countdown timers), and you can give each a descriptive name. It does have ads, but almost all of the time it's just a small banner across the top. There is an add-free version, but the dev wants $4 which seems a bit much.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jee.timer">Download on google play</a><br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9147672232285531429.post-61717962862610364792018-07-10T10:41:00.001-07:002020-05-19T13:05:38.284-07:00Antiyoy: turn based strategy game free/no ads<p class="mobile-photo"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhF6DAjBRKUhoTQ8WGtJCyz2NCAmJR1WyQmrqPzSVklLNkPmqhVfdMB2C9Pe1zaGEP08HC4mSw_Mx82z8kjXNIxsghTmDiSJBEDwGw0mLmiDTzT2KVAZ6uMmXiGHEi9hgFuZ-Nw78kgnQ/s1600/Screenshot_2018-07-10-10-19-35-769377.png"><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhF6DAjBRKUhoTQ8WGtJCyz2NCAmJR1WyQmrqPzSVklLNkPmqhVfdMB2C9Pe1zaGEP08HC4mSw_Mx82z8kjXNIxsghTmDiSJBEDwGw0mLmiDTzT2KVAZ6uMmXiGHEi9hgFuZ-Nw78kgnQ/s320/Screenshot_2018-07-10-10-19-35-769377.png" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_6576644923462841586"></a></p><p dir="ltr">https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=yio.tro.antiyoy.android<br></p><p dir="ltr">This strategy game is very simple and easy to learn, but satisfyingly challenging. It's a bit like chess in that there is no randomness. Stronger units always defeat weaker, but cost more to build and maintain. It's elegant in its simplicity: combining economy, fighting units, and defensive buildings, all distilled to their most simple form. The AI is decent but not great. The challenge comes from each new map increasing the odds against you. </p> <p dir="ltr">My criticism is that the challenge doesn't really increase very regularly - once every 10 maps or so it's really, really hard, followed almost immediately by a map so easy it's boring. The other problem is that after a while it all gets a bit repetitive, since it's always the same rules and units, just different maps. That said I've played over half of the 100 maps and it still draws me back in. Did I mention it's free and has zero ads?</p> <p dir="ltr"> I was a huge fan of advance wars on the gba. There aren't many games like that on Android, but this one scratches the same itch despite being entirely different. </p> Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0